WCLP Newsletter
Advocates: Register or login
The settlement of Napper v. Sacramento County ensures that some 5,000 adults with significant psych... Read More..
This week, the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) issued new state regulations resul... Read More..
CalWORKs recipients are paying more than $20 Million a year in surcharges to banks in order to ac... Read More..
Please subscribe to our RRS feed by clicking the button below to receive on-going updates to any new postings.
Despite it being a windy Monday, logic and fairness could not be blown over this morning as Los Angeles Superior Court Judge James C. Chalfant granted our petition for a writ of administrative mandamus and a writ of traditional mandamus in Camacho v. Allenby. Wendy Camacho, a CalWORKs recipient, will be reimbursed by the Department of Social Services (DSS) for the books and supplies she needed for her self-initiated program (SIP). DSS must now also pay for all supportive services necessary for CalWORKs recipients to participate in their SIPs, even when purchased prior to the signing of a welfare-to-work plan.
Ms. Camacho was studying to be a registered nurse when she applied for CalWORKs. After she began receiving CalWORKs, she purchased books and supplies for her classes. When the County approved her nursing program as a welfare-to-work activity shortly thereafter, it took the stance that the books and supplies, though necessary for the classes Ms. Camacho was currently taking, cannot be reimbursed because she bought them before the program’s approval. The Court found DSS’ contentions “not particularly enlightening” and correctly reasoned that the law requires payment of supportive services that are necessary for participation without a temporal limitation on when they are purchased. As Judge Chalfant noted, if Ms. Camacho, facing weekly exams, had waited until after County approval to buy her books, she might have flunked out of the nursing program altogether. The Legislature could not have intended such an absurd result, the Court reasoned. The Court’s decision upholds the intent of the Legislature to support CalWORKs recipients pursuing education leading to employment as a means of achieving self-sufficiency.
Our co-counsel in this case was the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles.